BOOK: Global Warming Skepticism for Busy People [Kindle Edition]

For anyone interested in being enlightened about the facts and truth — concerning global warming and climate science — I highly recommend this book. Professor Roy Spencer (author of this book, available on to purchase as well as on kindle) is certainly among the top-ten most esteemed knowledgeable scientists in this field [and because he is among the most eminent in his field, he is among the most viciously attacked by global warming alarmists for political reasons]. Dr. Spencer has maintained a website illustrating the latest global average tropospheric temperatures since 1979 — when NOAA satellites first began to carry out the measurements of the natural microwave thermal emissions from oxygen in the atmosphere.

The intensity of the signals that these microwave radiometers measure — at different microwave frequencies — is directly proportional to the temperature of different deep layers of the atmosphere. Every month, John Christy and Roy Spencer (at University of Alabama Birmingham; UAB) update daily global temperature datasets that represent the piecing together of temperature data from a total of fifteen instruments flying on different satellites over the years and covering close to 100% of Earth’s surface at all times. The latest dataset is always discussed on this web site.

Global Warming Skepticism for Busy People

By Author Roy Spencer

Format: Kindle Edition

4.9 out of 5 stars 168 ratings

This book draws on decades of climate research to explain why the threat of anthropogenic climate change has been grossly exaggerated. Global warming and associated climate change exists – but the role of humans in that change is entirely debatable. A little-known aspect of modern climate science is that the warming of the global atmosphere-ocean system over the last 100 years, even if entirely human-caused, has progressed at a rate that reduces the threat of future warming by 50% compared to the climate model projections. To the extent warming is partly natural (a possibility even the IPCC acknowledges), the future threat is reduced even further. This, by itself, should be part of the debate over energy policy – but it isn’t. Why?

The news media, politicians, bureaucrats, rent-seekers, government funding agencies, and a “scientific-technological elite” (as President Eisenhower called it) have collaborated to spread what amounts to fake climate news. Exaggerated climate claims appear on a daily basis, sucking the air out of more reasoned discussions of the scientific evidence which are too boring for a populace increasingly addicted to climate change porn. Upon close examination it is found that the “97% of climate scientists agree” meme is inaccurate, misleading, and useless for decision-making; human causation of warming is simply assumed by the vast majority of scientists who actually know little, if anything, about climatology.

In contrast to what many have been taught, there have been no obvious changes in severe weather — including hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts or floods. Despite an active 2018 wildfire season, there has actually been a long-term decrease in wildfire activity, although that will change if forest management practices are not implemented. Proxy evidence of past temperature and Arctic sea ice changes suggest a warming and sea ice decline over the last 50 years or so is not out of the ordinary, and partly or even mostly natural. The Antarctic ice sheet isn’t collapsing, but remains stable. The human component of sea level rise is shown to be, at most, only 1 inch per 30 years (25% of the observed rate of rise); and the latest evidence is that more CO2 dissolved in ocean water will be good for marine life, not harmful.

Admittedly, continued emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel burning can be expected to cause (and probably has caused) some of our recent warming. But the Paris Agreement, even if extended through the end of the 21st century, will have no measurable effect on global temperatures, because the governments of the world realize humanity will depend upon fossil fuels for decades to come (until perhaps humans will accept atomic energy — or develop fusion energy in an inexpensive form). Despite news reports and politicians’ proclamations, international agreements to reduce CO2 emissions are all economic pain for no observable climate gain. What government-mandated reliance on expensive and impractical energy sources will do — is simply to increase energy poverty, and poverty kills.

This downside to illusory efforts to “Save the Earth” is already being experienced in the U.K. and elsewhere. If people are genuinely concerned about humanity thriving, they must reject global warming alarmism. In terms of environmental regulation, the end result of the U.S. EPA’s Endangerment Finding will be reduced prosperity for all, and climate gain for none. The good news is that there is no global warming crisis, and this book will inform citizens and help guide governments toward decisions which benefit the most people while doing the least harm.

This entry was posted in Center for Environmental Genetics. Bookmark the permalink.