A timely notice from NIH, concerning publishing NIH-funded research in these 15,000+ “predatory online open-access journals”

For anyone who did not receive this directly from NIH today, this Notice discreetly discusses “predatory online open-access journals” –– without actually calling them by that name. This is a timely reminder of the increasing seriousness of this fraudulent issue.

Notice Number: NOT-OD-18-011
Key Dates
Release Date: November 3, 2017
Related Announcements
Issued by
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
To protect the credibility of published research, authors are encouraged to publish papers arising from NIH-funded research in reputable journals.
Effective communication of scientific results is an essential part of the scientific process. In support of public access to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research, authors are encouraged to publish their results in reputable journals. The NIH has noted an increase in the numbers of papers reported as products of NIH funding which are published in journals, or by publishers that do not follow best practices promoted by professional scholarly publishing organizations. These journals and publishers typically can be identified by several attributes, including:

misleading pricing (e.g., lack of transparency about article processing charges);
failure to disclose information to authors;
aggressive tactics to solicit article submissions;
inaccurate statements about editorial board membership; and
misleading or suspicious peer-review processes.

Publications using such practices may call into question the credibility of the research they report.

Recommendations to identify credible journals

To help protect the credibility of papers arising from its research investment, NIH encourages its stakeholders, including grantees, contractors, intramural researchers, and librarians, to help authors:

Adhere to the principles of research integrity and publication ethics;
Identify journals that follow best practices promoted by professional scholarly publishing organizations; and
Avoid publishing in journals that do not have a clearly stated and rigorous peer review process.

Existing resources can assist in this process. Guidance for researchers include:
Think Check Submit, a publishing industry resource; and
“Academics and scientists: Beware of predatory journal publishers,” information from the Federal Trade Commission.

The National Library of Medicine –– the NIH entity that maintains PubMed and PubMed Central –– encourages publishers to follow established industry best practices including:

Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals [PDF] from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE); and
Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, the joint statement by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).


Please direct all inquiries to:

Office of Extramural Research
Email: PublicAccess@nih.gov
Website: http://publicaccess.nih.gov


This entry was posted in Center for Environmental Genetics. Bookmark the permalink.